Smart-city projects on the operator's own word
526 of 871 published projects — 60.4% — where the strongest available source is the operator or the city itself.
Impact figures self-reported by the operator or city (official report or press release).
This is the normal state of the smart-city record, and it deserves a fair reading. The operator is frequently the only party in a position to count what happened; the report exists, it is named on the entry, and it is public. What it is not is a measurement by somebody who could have published an inconvenient number. 315 of these entries carry a figure for what the project achieved, and every one of those figures was produced by the organisation it reflects on.
Membership here is decided by the data, not by an editor: this page lists every published entry whose evidence grade is the one named above, so nothing can be quietly left out. The grade records the strongest kind of source behind an entry — not how well the project worked.
✔ Every published entry is checked against the public sources it cites before publication.
All 526 entries
Show 511 more projectsShow fewer
The rest of the record
Each of these is the same kind of page — a slice of the atlas whose membership is decided by a field rather than by an editor.
