⚖️

PDDL

The Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication: the city gives up its rights entirely. The most permissive rung on this ladder, and the rarest.

How this list is decided. Membership is not a field an editor set: it is every published entry whose own text names PDDL, matched at build time, with the sentence printed under each row so you can judge the match yourself. 11 entries in 7 cities.

✔ Every published entry is checked against the public sources it cites before publication.

Where it appears in the atlas

🇺🇸 Boston Analyze Boston and the 2014 Open Data Executive Order since 2014 · Official

The policy names CC BY 4.0 as the default licence; the portal ships PDDL public-domain dedications instead.

🇺🇸 Boston BOS:311 and Boston's Service-Request Record since 2009 · Peer-reviewed

The dataset and the licence position: Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL), updated daily, publisher Department of Innovation and Technology, provider Boston 311, source the city CRM, with per-year CSV files from 2011 to 2026.

🇺🇸 Boston Climate Ready Boston since 2016 · Independent

The maps themselves, under the Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL), served as an ArcGIS GeoService REST API by Boston Maps.

🇺🇸 Boston Vision Zero Boston: 25 mph default limit and open crash records since 2015 · Peer-reviewed

The data layer, and the licence answer: 'Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL)'.

🇧🇷 Curitiba Curitiba Open Data Portal since 2024 · Official

There's no formal open license — the portal's terms just ask users to cite the source and disclaim accuracy after download, a step behind CC0/PDDL portals like Zürich's or Boston's.

🇨🇳 Guangzhou Guangzhou Public Data Open Platform since 2016 · Official

Use is free and non-discriminatory, but it is not an open licence in the CC0/PDDL sense: the municipal government's record of the terms requires crediting "Guangzhou Public Data Open Platform" as the source, forbids reselling the data, and asks users to register their intended use.

🇺🇸 Philadelphia OpenDataPhilly / City of Philadelphia Open Data Program since 2012 · Official

A large, long-running catalog is not the same claim as an open license — reserving 'all rights' in the terms of use puts Philadelphia's own datasets closer to nyc-open-data's no-dedication default than to the PDDL cities.

🇺🇸 San Francisco DataSF and San Francisco's Open Data Law since 2009 · Official

Unusually for a US city, the data carries a recognised open licence, PDDL 1.0, and the inventory Chapter 22D requires is itself published as a dataset.

🇺🇸 San Francisco SF311 and its Open311 Write API since 2007 · Official

Socrata metadata names the licence as the Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, PDDL 1.0 — an actual dedication instrument, not merely an absence of terms.

🇨🇱 Santiago Observatorio Santiago: One Comuna's Geodata, and a City Without a Catalogue since 2023 · Official

Counted the same day from the CKAN API of the national portal datos.gob.cl: 3,149 datasets from 231 publishing organisations, of which 1,313 are Creative Commons Non-Commercial, 922 CC BY, 421 CC0, 352 ODC-PDDL, 52 ODC-BY, 50 ODbL and 23 explicitly unspecified.

🇸🇪 Stockholm Stockholm Open Data Portal since 2011 · Official

Stockholm illustrates the gap between 'freely reusable' language and a formal open license: the Traffic Office's own portal calls its data 'license-free', but no CC0/CC-BY/PDDL dedication could be confirmed for the city's open-data effort as a whole, and the main catalog's JavaScript-only interface makes even a basi…

Others in this group

The whole layer

Every standard, protocol and licence the atlas names, with the open-data licence ladder in one table: Standards & licences.

✉️ Get the next source-checked smart-city project in your inbox

One short email a week: the Landmark, one Insight, the new cities. No spam, one-click unsubscribe. About the newsletter · RSS