Start here

Three entries that show what Hyderabad is actually doing.

Timeline (2017–2025)

• 2017 — Hyderabad Metro CBTC Signalling Live
• 2022 — Adaptive Traffic Signal Control (ATCS/CoSiCoSt) Live
• 2022 — Telangana State Police Integrated Command & Control Centre (ICCC) Live
• 2023 — TSRTC Gamyam Real-Time Bus Tracking Live
• 2024 — HYDRAA Lake & Public-Asset GIS Protection Live
• 2025 — HMWSSB SCADA Distribution-Network Water Monitoring Live

All 6 projects in Hyderabad

✔ Every published entry is checked against the public sources it cites before publication.

Compare with other cities

• 🇺🇸 New York City: MTA Subway Communications-Based Train Control Same technology gap in a much larger system — CBTC lets both automate braking, but neither runs unattended.
• 🇬🇧 Maidstone: Drone Fly-Tipping Detection & Enforcement Both pair aerial imagery with enforcement against illegal land use, though only Maidstone's camera layer is actually live.
• 🇪🇨 Quito: Quito Metro Line 1: Alstom CITYFLO 350 CBTC Signaling Quito's Alstom CBTC is the same signalling family, deployed to run trains with crew rather than switch to driverless.
• 🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City: HCMC Intelligent Traffic Control Center Both pair adaptive signal control with cameras, but Ho Chi Minh City's system is built around ANPR enforcement, not just traffic flow.

Show 12 more comparisonsShow fewer

• 🇨🇳 Chongqing: Central Urban Area Intelligent Traffic Management Application Contrast in scale: Chongqing's brain claims 1.5bn fused records citywide; Hyderabad's adaptive signals cover select junctions.
• 🇧🇷 Belo Horizonte: COP-BH: Belo Horizonte's Integrated Operations Center Another multi-agency command centre justified by camera counts and cost, with no independent evaluation of results either.
• 🇴🇲 Muscat: Nama Water SCADA Distribution Network Both utilities run bulk SCADA for years before pushing sensors into the distribution network — Muscat via a dedicated rehabilitation push.
• 🇺🇿 Tashkent: Centralized SCADA Hydraulic Pipeline Strategy Same leak-reduction goal — Tashkent's SUEZ-run plan targets 33M m3 a year citywide, Hyderabad's pilot has only reached one neighbourhood.
• 🇮🇳 Bengaluru: Bengaluru Adaptive Traffic Control System Same C-DAC CoSiCoSt signal software, same country — Bangalore reached 169 junctions, Hyderabad's adaptive logic covers just 122 of 334.
• 🇮🇳 New Delhi: Citywide CCTV Rollout and Delhi Police Facial Recognition Same accountability gap: Delhi's audit found camera-count discrepancies; Hyderabad's facial-recognition case is still in court.
• 🇮🇳 Bengaluru: Lakes Monitoring System and the Kere Mitra Volunteers Same genre one state over — Bengaluru's lake portal tracks upkeep, HYDRAA's satellite/GIS work tracks encroachment boundaries.
• 🇮🇳 Kolkata: Green Line CBTC Signalling & Automatic Train Operation (Kolkata Metro) Both Indian metros run CBTC without full unattended operation — compare Grade of Automation levels and how each stayed short of driverless.
• 🇮🇳 Pune: Pune Metro's CBTC Signalling (Lines 1 & 2) Same choice: Pune's CBTC also supports driverless running, but the operator keeps two drivers aboard, just like Hyderabad.
• 🇮🇳 Pune: Pune's Adaptive Traffic Management System (ATMS) Another Indian adaptive-signal rollout with a rocky start — neither city has published an independent measurement of the upgrade.
• 🇮🇳 Chennai: Chennai Safe City Integrated Command & Control Centre Peer Indian command centre: Chennai's ICCC also runs AI video analytics for safety, on a far smaller footprint than Telangana's.
• 🇮🇳 Pune: Pune's GIS-Based Property Tax Mapping Same GIS boundary-mapping tool, opposite purpose — Pune draws parcels to collect tax, HYDRAA draws them to reclaim public land.