Permanent project revision
Revision 2026-08-20-source-dates · effective 2026-07-26
Current revision. This is the snapshot used by the live entity page.
Created the first structured Evidence Passport with 1 claim and 11 source dossiers.
sha256:7f0c1bfe3947251335f40c94151e76c197a9224797245813913c9c2587ba6a8d
add /evidencePassport — Added claim-level evidence mapping and source dossiers.add /revisionHistory — Established a permanent, hash-addressed baseline revision.The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.
clm-d3b173414d3cace0
quantitative
A 2023 Universidad Diego Portales survey of Chile's 345 municipalities, to which 261 replied, put Las Condes first in the country both for security spending, at CLP 76,931 million, and for the number of security measures in place
This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.
Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.
sha256:7f0c1bfe3947251335f40c94151e76c197a9224797245813913c9c2587ba6a8d
src-28f56c554b7c1c7dFetched OK. Operator page: 'Sistema de mas de 3.300 camaras, con las que se monitorea las 24 horas del dia' and five municipal security centres (Quinchamali, Presidente Errazuriz, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Alexander Fleming, Apoquindo). Verified negative: this page does not mention facial recognition, and gives no breakdown of how many cameras the municipality owns.
src-ebcd9b80cddd7b53Fetched OK. Confirms the same 3,300+ figure and 24-hour monitoring. No drones, no facial recognition and no start year for the camera network on this page — the network's start year is not documented in any source found, which is why yearStart follows the 2017 drone programme.
src-9f35ce1daad205ddFetched OK. Supports: two drones, five municipal inspectors, DGAC certification after months of training, 15 plazas, 6pm to midnight, and the retention rule: 'Las grabaciones solo pueden ser guardadas durante 30 dias, luego se borran, y cualquier persona puede solicitar acceso a ellas y pedir que eliminen aquellas en las que esta su imagen.' Note a date conflict left unresolved: this piece dates the start to April 2017, other coverage says March (DGAC support) or May 2017 (a later La Tercera headline); the entry says 2017 and April only where this source says so.
src-1c668e213a19ee98Fetched OK. Supports the date, the parties (five residents plus NGO Derechos Digitales), the unanimous rejection of the recurso de proteccion, and Derechos Digitales director Maria Paz Canales calling the ruling erroneous and noting no legislation governs the technology. The entry makes no claim about whether flights were suspended during proceedings, because sources conflict on that point.
src-cc22bf1b61eb87e6FETCH FAILED (HTTP 403). Existence and coverage confirmed via search; carried only as a corroborating legal-press record of the same 12 December 2017 ruling, no unique fact rests on it.
src-ef4417d177b81a5fFetched OK. Strongest recent source: the programme is still running. Supports 'patrullaje aereo a traves de drones', 'mas de 200 inspectores de la Direccion de Seguridad' (a 60% increase), 'mas de 4 mil camaras de seguridad', 'un anillo digital con 55 porticos y 95 camaras lectoras de patentes', and mixed patrols with Carabineros. Its camera count exceeds the municipal website's 3,300; both figures are given rather than reconciled.
src-218cd88cfeca9289Fetched OK. Independent academic registry (Universidad Adolfo Ibanez). Supports: vendor IDEMIA (Morpho Video Investigator), start 2019, ten real-time cameras, matching against the PDI's own facial database, municipality supplies infrastructure while the PDI operates the software, and that no ethical assessment framework is recorded. Its own last status note is 'in use as of March 2020' — no source found confirms whether the system still operates, which the entry states rather than guesses.
src-6f2a99a99cf65281Fetched OK. Investigative outlet working from municipal records. Source of the CLP 352 million figure, the 28 January 2019 contract date, and the two detections in the six months to 28 December 2020. IMPORTANT: the article covers Las Condes and Lo Barnechea, two separate comunas; only the Las Condes figures are used here, and Lo Barnechea's separate CLP 45 million contract is deliberately excluded.
src-654831029a4af313Fetched OK. Reports the 2023 Universidad Diego Portales study 'Municipios y seguridad publica ciudadana' (all 345 municipalities surveyed, 261 responded). Carrying sentence: 'Las Condes invirtio $76.931 millones y aplica mas medidas de seguridad en Chile, seguida por Quilicura, Puente Alto y Huechuraba. Todas estas 3, pertenecientes a la region Metropolitana, invirtieron mas de $23 mil millones.' The study ranks absolute spending and does not itself compare rich and poor comunas, so the entry reports the ranking and does not assert a causal inequality claim.
src-5079dc479a12c5b7FETCH FAILED (request timed out after 60s; a second Emol URL also timed out). Existence and content confirmed via search; the CPLT accuracy warning rests on the article headline, which states it verbatim. Also fixes the December 2019 public launch date.
src-aaaaa82f296d876eRegulator reference for the certification requirement. Tested and did NOT confirm the hypothesis that a regulator grounded municipal drone programmes: no evidence was found of any DGAC restriction on Las Condes. The documented direction is the opposite — the DGAC trained and certified the municipal operators, and its operational-safety director stated publicly that municipalities may fly over populated areas where the regulation's 'public interest' test is met.