Permanent project revision

Oslo Climate Budget

Revision 2026-08-26-claim-mapping · effective 2026-07-17

Superseded. A later revision exists: 2026-08-27-source-dating →

unreviewed

Added a six-claim evidence mapping and a sourced lesson; the 2030 projection is now the single figure its source states (65 per cent) rather than a range, and the entry records that the emissions account behind the 28 per cent is the national environment agency's, not the city's.

sha256:d1cf8712e4ec851d0cdf2c4ceca831b20f14a17603cf72578c71caf06b1f6158

Change set

  • replace /snapshot/projectFingerprint — Updated projectFingerprint to the current sourced project record.
  • replace /snapshot/claims — Updated claims to the current sourced project record.
  • replace /snapshot/sources — Updated sources to the current sourced project record.
6
of 6 claims mapped
3
source dossiers
2
publication dates recorded
1
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Claims, one by one

The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.

Claim 1 clm-56c96b8fb1a10393 descriptive
its climate budget sets sector-by-sector emission ceilings and assigns each cutting measure to a responsible agency, run through the same annual cycle as the money budget
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The independent account describes the budget as the city's mechanism for accountability, quoting the climate agency's director on why it exists: earlier climate action plans were sent into the bureaucracy and never followed up.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. World Resources Institute (research)
  2. Klima Oslo (authority)
Claim 2 clm-9cfe6e07432ed173 quantitative
Oslo's pledge is a 95% cut in city-level emissions by 2030 against 2009
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The account states the pledge to reduce city-level greenhouse gas emissions by 95% by 2030 compared to 2009 levels.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. World Resources Institute (research)
Claim 3 clm-961df6c481813998 quantitative
An independent account of the budget reports a 28% reduction achieved so far and, on currently adopted measures, a projection of 65% by 2030 — a gap the city reports itself
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The account states both figures in one sentence: a 28% reduction achieved and a projected 65% by 2030 with current adopted measures.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. World Resources Institute (research)
Claim 4 clm-3678516869c55e29 quantitative
The territorial emissions account behind the 28% is produced by Norway's national Environment Agency, not by the city
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The national Environment Agency publishes the municipal greenhouse gas account that the city's figure rests on.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Miljødirektoratet — municipal GHG account (independent)
Claim 5 clm-7f485ddba511050e quantitative
About 200 Norwegian municipalities have taken up the model
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The account reports about 200 Norwegian municipalities adopting the climate budget model.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. World Resources Institute (research)
Claim 6 clm-7e5928b2789b2a0e quantitative
Oslo publishes one, reporting a projection of 65% against its own 95% target while the numbers behind it come from the national environment agency rather than from itself
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The projection and the target are in the independent account; the emissions account they are measured against is the national agency's.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. World Resources Institute (research)
  2. Miljødirektoratet — municipal GHG account (independent)

Source dossiers and revision state

This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.

unreviewed Revision 2026-08-26-claim-mapping effective 2026-07-17 · created 2026-08-26

Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.

Erratum on this revision's envelope. The snapshot, its hash and its permanent link are untouched.

  • createdAt previously read 2026-08-26T23:37:00Z. The batching script that produced this revision advanced createdAt into the future to satisfy the strictly-increasing order the validator requires per entity. The value never recorded a real event; the corrected value is the moment the revision provably existed in the repository. Corrected to 2026-08-26T23:13:33Z on 2026-08-27; evidence: first appears in commit 5e17071a63, committed 2026-08-26T23:13:33Z.
sha256:d1cf8712e4ec851d0cdf2c4ceca831b20f14a17603cf72578c71caf06b1f6158
6
of 6 claims mapped
3
source dossiers
2
publication dates recorded
1
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Governance facts carried by the record

Operator
City of Oslo (Klima Oslo)
Actor types
city-government
Funding model
Not recorded
Funding description
Not recorded
Cost
Not recorded
Ownership
Not recorded
Decision rights
Not recorded
Exit conditions
Not recorded

3 source dossiers

Klima Oslo (authority) klimaoslo.no · 1 linked claim

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-4327b076c004ac8a
Publisher
Name not classified · klimaoslo.no
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2024-02-05
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-07-17
Dossier created
2026-08-26
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Official page by the city or public authority behind the project.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
World Resources Institute (research) wri.org · 5 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-679469c4435d75bf
Publisher
Name not classified · wri.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2024-07-15
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-07-17
Dossier created
2026-08-26
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Further information on the project.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Miljødirektoratet — municipal GHG account (independent) miljodirektoratet.no · 2 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-6a27cbf027fca21e
Publisher
Name not classified · miljodirektoratet.no
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
Not recorded
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-07-17
Dossier created
2026-08-26
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
Open archived copy ↗ · 2026-06-09
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Norway's national Environment Agency produces the territorial emissions account behind Oslo's −28% figure — independent of the city.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Known limits of this passport
  • Publisher names and source languages have not yet been classified; domains are recorded without guessing.
  • Existing source notes are descriptive locators, not page- or paragraph-exact citations.
  • A missing archive, publication date or content hash is shown as null rather than inferred.
  • The project-level evidence grade ranks the strongest source in the entry; it is not a truth score for every claim.