1001 Smart Cities

Permanent project revision

mos.ru — Moscow's E-Government Portal

Revision 2026-08-28-p4-uplift · effective 2026-08-28

Current revision. This is the snapshot used by the live entity page.

unreviewed

Created the first structured Evidence Passport with 7 claims and 3 source dossiers.

sha256:0a127803e678123a272aedc710c78e826ba565dab45aa5fee6c701758aef5652
All revisions → Current entity page →

Change set

  • add /evidencePassport — Added claim-level evidence mapping and source dossiers.
  • add /revisionHistory — Established a permanent, hash-addressed baseline revision.
7
of 7 claims mapped
3
source dossiers
3
publication dates recorded
0
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Claims, one by one

The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.

Claim 1 clm-02819d1d46ffd81a quantitative
In 2018 the UN's e-government survey looked at cities for the first time, scoring 40 of them against 60 indicators in a pilot Local Online Services Index
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The write-up states that this was the first city-level edition, the number of cities and the indicator count.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Smart Cities World (press)
  2. UN Public Administration (authority)
Claim 2 clm-2dc3efc7df3217d7 quantitative
Moscow came first with 55 of the 60, ahead of Cape Town and Tallinn
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Both the score and the runners-up are stated.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Smart Cities World (press)
  2. UN Public Administration (authority)
Claim 3 clm-d2c6bddb0fb463e0 quantitative
carried over 400 services and functions by the start of 2024
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The city's own review of 2023 says so.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. mos.ru (operator)
Claim 4 clm-0f9edf426be67723 quantitative
Since the first digital services launched in 2011, mos.ru reports its services and functions have been used over 3.7 billion times, across 15.8 million user accounts
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Both figures come from one sentence of the city's own review.
Caveat
The city's own figures; no outside body has audited them.

Sources carrying this claim

  1. mos.ru (operator)
Claim 5 clm-6b344a64fd0f3b17 quantitative
In 2023 alone the city counted over 760 million uses, 16 per cent more than in 2022
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The annual figure and the growth rate are both stated.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. mos.ru (operator)
Claim 6 clm-9e7660b8dfb37ce3 descriptive
what it scored was municipal websites - technical performance, content, the count of services offered - not what residents got out of them
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The write-up lists the assessment criteria.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Smart Cities World (press)
Claim 7 clm-c57fc8f5b5085a93 descriptive
the UN's own e-government knowledge base carries the trade-press write-up word for word, three days after it appeared
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The UN page is filed under "E-Government Survey in Media", is dated 30 July 2018, and reproduces the 27 July text.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. UN Public Administration (authority)
  2. Smart Cities World (press)

Source dossiers and revision state

This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.

unreviewed Revision 2026-08-28-p4-uplift effective 2026-08-28 · created 2026-08-28

Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.

sha256:0a127803e678123a272aedc710c78e826ba565dab45aa5fee6c701758aef5652
Revision history → Permanent version link → Machine-readable record → Evidence Constitution →
7
of 7 claims mapped
3
source dossiers
3
publication dates recorded
0
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Governance facts carried by the record

Operator
Moscow City Government (mos.ru)
Actor types
city-government
Funding model
public
Funding description
Not recorded
Cost
Not recorded
Ownership
Not recorded
Decision rights
Not recorded
Exit conditions
Not recorded

3 source dossiers

UN Public Administration (authority) publicadministration.un.org · 3 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-67ced77b23945e3a
Publisher
Name not classified · publicadministration.un.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2018-07-30
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-28
Dossier created
2026-08-28
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Filed under "E-Government Survey in Media" and posted 30 July 2018: "ranks digital services across 40 cities, with Moscow topping the list, followed by Cape Town and Tallinn", "this is the first time the survey has also looked at digital services in specific cities", "Each city was analysed against 60 LOSI indicators", "Moscow scored 55 out of the 60 indicators". The text is identical to the Smart Cities World article of three days earlier - this is the UN's media archive reproducing the trade press, not a second, independent account.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Smart Cities World (press) smartcitiesworld.net · 4 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-2818889efc7de946
Publisher
Name not classified · smartcitiesworld.net
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2018-07-27
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-28
Dossier created
2026-08-28
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

The original trade-press write-up of the 2018 pilot index, 27 July 2018, carrying the same wording that later appears in the UN media archive.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
mos.ru (operator) mos.ru · 3 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-59d738ed96a12589
Publisher
Name not classified · mos.ru
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2024-02-01
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-28
Dossier created
2026-08-28
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

City portal review of 2023, 1 February 2024: "Today our portal offers over 400 services and functions"; "over 400 thous. users signed up to mos.ru in 2023; the portals service and functions were used over 760 million times: 16 per cent growth compared to 2022"; "From the time the first digital services were launched in 2011, they have been used over 3.7 billion times; the total number of mos.ru user accounts reached 15.8 million." All figures are the city's own.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Known limits of this passport
  • Publisher names and source languages have not yet been classified; domains are recorded without guessing.
  • Existing source notes are descriptive locators, not page- or paragraph-exact citations.
  • A missing archive, publication date or content hash is shown as null rather than inferred.
  • The project-level evidence grade ranks the strongest source in the entry; it is not a truth score for every claim.