Permanent project revision

Urban Forest Visual & Email-a-Tree

Revision 2026-08-20-source-dates · effective 2026-08-02

Current revision. This is the snapshot used by the live entity page.

unreviewed

Created the first structured Evidence Passport with 1 claim and 4 source dossiers.

sha256:83c337616104c066937bbf10b7907e9bc33b9f1bddb5bd6d69e3934a7393417d

Change set

  • add /evidencePassport — Added claim-level evidence mapping and source dossiers.
  • add /revisionHistory — Established a permanent, hash-addressed baseline revision.
1
of 1 claims mapped
4
source dossiers
2
publication dates recorded
1
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Claims, one by one

The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.

Claim 1 clm-459e2bc9f12ed03d quantitative
The 2012–13 tree census recorded all of the City of Melbourne's roughly 70,000 street trees — species, size, condition and an estimate of each tree's useful life — and published them as the public Urban Forest Visual map
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The impact states the census figure is corroborated by AIPH's green-city case study.
Caveat
The entry's lesson notes the project's fame rests on the email-a-tree turn, which is well documented but is engagement, not a proven climate outcome.

Sources carrying this claim

  1. AIPH — Melbourne urban forestry (independent case study)

Source dossiers and revision state

This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.

unreviewed Revision 2026-08-20-source-dates effective 2026-08-02 · created 2026-08-20

Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.

sha256:83c337616104c066937bbf10b7907e9bc33b9f1bddb5bd6d69e3934a7393417d
1
of 1 claims mapped
4
source dossiers
2
publication dates recorded
1
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Governance facts carried by the record

Operator
City of Melbourne
Actor types
city-government
Funding model
public
Funding description
Not recorded
Cost
Not recorded
Ownership
Not recorded
Decision rights
Not recorded
Exit conditions
Not recorded

4 source dossiers

City of Melbourne — Urban Forest Strategy (authority) melbourne.vic.gov.au · background

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-fac440eaae2944fe
Publisher
Name not classified · melbourne.vic.gov.au
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
Not recorded
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-20
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Official City of Melbourne page for the urban forest programme behind the map and email-a-tree feature.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Background source; no baseline claim points here
Urban Forest Visual (project tool) melbourneurbanforestvisual.com.au · background

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-949a98ba835b2921
Publisher
Name not classified · melbourneurbanforestvisual.com.au
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2025-05-01
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-20
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

The interactive map itself: every tree with ID, species and life expectancy; contact-a-tree function.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Background source; no baseline claim points here
Biophilic Cities (research) biophiliccities.org · background

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-9d0bb0cca2a5e187
Publisher
Name not classified · biophiliccities.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2018-12-12
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-20
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Case study of the email-a-tree / Treemail phenomenon.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Background source; no baseline claim points here
AIPH — Melbourne urban forestry (independent case study) aiph.org · 1 linked claim

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-da7e41389d43df82
Publisher
Name not classified · aiph.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
Not recorded
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-20
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
Open archived copy ↗ · 2026-01-17
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Independent green-city body confirming the 70,000-tree survey and the 22%→40%-by-2040 canopy target.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Known limits of this passport
  • Publisher names and source languages have not yet been classified; domains are recorded without guessing.
  • Existing source notes are descriptive locators, not page- or paragraph-exact citations.
  • A missing archive, publication date or content hash is shown as null rather than inferred.
  • The project-level evidence grade ranks the strongest source in the entry; it is not a truth score for every claim.