1001 Smart Cities

Permanent project revision

Zhujiang New Town Automated People Mover (APM)

Revision 2026-08-27-source-dating · effective 2026-08-02

Current revision. This is the snapshot used by the live entity page.

unreviewed

Every source on this entry now carries a date key: a publication date where the publisher states one, otherwise an explicit null with the reason on the record.

sha256:58b4b2b98ab9d1ff31488ae1120226b1ea906ea7da16dcf24248e72ccc8d97d6
All revisions → Current entity page →

Change set

  • replace /snapshot/projectFingerprint — Updated projectFingerprint to the current sourced project record.
  • replace /snapshot/sources — Updated sources to the current sourced project record.
18
of 18 claims mapped
7
source dossiers
5
publication dates recorded
0
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Claims, one by one

The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.

Claim 1 clm-ea2a39dff523a72f quantitative
opened on 8 November 2010
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The encyclopedia entry's infobox gives the opening date, the operator and the nine underground stations; it is used here only for the structural facts of the line, not for any ridership figure.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Wikipedia (background)
Claim 2 clm-e4e2038d32bffbd0 quantitative
about 4km of tunnel from Linhexi through the Zhujiang New Town CBD to Canton Tower
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Guangzhou Daily gives the length and the two termini in the same sentence.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily / Xinhuacheng — can the APM line be extended? Lingnan Square station has left room (25 April 2023)
Claim 3 clm-f432dcfb363a71f5 descriptive
nine underground stations
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Infobox: nine stations, character underground.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Wikipedia (background)
Claim 4 clm-4162dcea1adc49e2 descriptive
rubber-tyred Bombardier trains
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The line runs 14 Bombardier Innovia APM 100 cars on a central guideway with rubber tyres.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Wikipedia (background)
Claim 5 clm-33ed47b0264c045d quantitative
running without a driver under the CityFlo 650 signalling system at the highest automation grade
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The peer-reviewed review of full-automation urban rail records the line as adopting Bombardier's CityFlo 650 CBTC at the highest automation grade in November 2010. The publisher's site serves the article only behind a session cookie and could not be read at this verification, so no locator string is given; Crossref confirms the article's identity and its publication date of 28 October 2022.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Autonomous Intelligent Systems (Springer) — urban rail full-automation systems, peer-reviewed (28 October 2022)
Claim 6 clm-1358f7d77f25e565 quantitative
It spent its first year as a sightseeing trial that stopped running at 20:00
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The report marks the end of the one-year sightseeing trial period and lists the earlier extensions of the closing time from the original 20:00.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — one year of sightseeing trial operation completed, last train put back half an hour (9 November 2011)
Claim 8 clm-f73fd2b10650a29c quantitative
in January 2011 a reporter counting one afternoon rode a train carrying 26 passengers against a design capacity of 276
Published field
snippet · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The reporter counted four trains that afternoon and rode one carrying 26 people, noting the design capacity of 276.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — a whole train carrying 26 passengers, APM called too empty (26 January 2011)
Claim 9 clm-d7f77f39909d0ef6 quantitative
About 7,000 riders a day in January 2011 — 14% of the 50,000 a day the metro company had forecast for 2010 and 2011
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The paper attributes the ridership figure to data obtained from an authoritative department and states the share against the metro company's own forecast.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — a whole train carrying 26 passengers, APM called too empty (26 January 2011)
Claim 10 clm-29a743ad7ee97b14 quantitative
By July 2014 it was 29,034 a day, still under 60% of that forecast though 21.68% up on the year before
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Guangzhou Daily prints the metro company's July 2014 figure, its share of the forecast made three years earlier and the year-on-year change. Read from the Internet Archive copy of 20 August 2014; the publisher's object store no longer holds the article.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily — "the APM line cannot fill up": should it be extended south to Kecun? archived copy (20 August 2014)
Claim 11 clm-67322c5621cf81ee quantitative
not one APM station had had to hold passengers back that year, while Line 3 alongside ran at 138.61% of capacity in the morning peak
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The same report states that no APM station had applied passenger-flow control that year and gives Line 3's morning-peak load factor from the same monthly data set.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily — "the APM line cannot fill up": should it be extended south to Kecun? archived copy (20 August 2014)
Claim 12 clm-d92bba364e22b0d6 quantitative
The forecast was met in 2018, at 49,000 riders a day, eight years after opening
Published field
impact · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Guangzhou Daily states that the forecast was 50,000 a day for the early period of operation, that ridership persistently fell short in the early years, and that the 2018 average of 49,000 reached it. The interval is the gap between two dated statements in the sources, not a figure either source gives.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily / Xinhuacheng — can the APM line be extended? Lingnan Square station has left room (25 April 2023)
Claim 13 clm-12f83c3331928f08 quantitative
a complaint alleged that platforms narrower than 2.5m, stations with a single street entrance and stations without escalators breached the national metro design code
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The paper quotes the three alleged defects from the complaint and names the code, GB50157-2003.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — APM design alleged non-compliant, Guangzhou Metro denies (12 April 2011)
Claim 14 clm-445e5b82a5b51f90 quantitative
a reporter who went and measured found a side platform of about 1.7m at Tianhe South
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The reporter read the code, visited the stations and confirmed all three points, measuring the side platform at Tianhe South.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — APM design alleged non-compliant, Guangzhou Metro denies (12 April 2011)
Claim 15 clm-5b8a368cea918352 quantitative
Guangzhou Metro answered that the code does not apply to the APM, because a rubber-tyred guideway carrying 10,000 passengers an hour is far below the standard of 30,000 an hour and up that the code was written for
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Quoted from the operator's written reply to the paper.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — APM design alleged non-compliant, Guangzhou Metro denies (12 April 2011)
Claim 16 clm-a367abba6ce994e7 descriptive
did not say which code does apply
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The reporter states that the question was put explicitly and that Guangzhou Metro gave no clear answer to it.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Xinkuaibao — APM design alleged non-compliant, Guangzhou Metro denies (12 April 2011)
Claim 17 clm-7e898b47c223ebd2 descriptive
the line was built to take three-car trains and was given two-car sets because early ridership was low
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
Guangzhou Daily states the line was built to the capacity of three-car formations and that two-car trains were configured at the time in view of low early ridership.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily / Xinhuacheng — can the APM line be extended? Lingnan Square station has left room (25 April 2023)
Claim 18 clm-7bdbb649d8f23c83 quantitative
by 2023 the operator was commissioning a study to buy more vehicles, because capacity was about to run short and some equipment was reaching the end of its design life
Published field
lesson · verbatim
Mapping
mapped · no interpretation or interpolation added by this passport
What the mapping says
The report quotes the tender notice for the project proposal and feasibility study, which names both reasons.
Caveat
No claim-specific caveat recorded

Sources carrying this claim

  1. Guangzhou Daily / Xinhuacheng — can the APM line be extended? Lingnan Square station has left room (25 April 2023)

Source dossiers and revision state

This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.

unreviewed Revision 2026-08-27-source-dating effective 2026-08-02 · created 2026-08-27

Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.

sha256:58b4b2b98ab9d1ff31488ae1120226b1ea906ea7da16dcf24248e72ccc8d97d6
Revision history → Permanent version link → Machine-readable record → Evidence Constitution →
18
of 18 claims mapped
7
source dossiers
5
publication dates recorded
0
archives linked
0
exact locators
0
content captures hashed

Governance facts carried by the record

Operator
Guangzhou Metro Corporation
Actor types
utility
Funding model
public
Funding description
Not recorded
Cost
Not recorded
Ownership
Not recorded
Decision rights
Not recorded
Exit conditions
Not recorded

7 source dossiers

Wikipedia (background) en.wikipedia.org · 3 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-2688f802dcf8c58f
Publisher
Name not classified · en.wikipedia.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
Not recorded
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Opening date (8 November 2010), operator, nine underground stations, rubber-tyred Bombardier Innovia APM 100 rolling stock, flat 2-yuan fare.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Autonomous Intelligent Systems (Springer) — urban rail full-automation systems, peer-reviewed (28 October 2022) researchgate.net · 1 linked claim

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-bf59fc7cdbdfc683
Publisher
Name not classified · researchgate.net
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
Not recorded
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Academic paper on urban-rail full-automation (FAO) systems confirming the Zhujiang New Town APM adopted Bombardier's Cityflo 650 CBTC at GoA4 in November 2010. No publication date is recorded: the page did not answer when this entry was checked.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Xinkuaibao — a whole train carrying 26 passengers, APM called too empty (26 January 2011) news.sina.com.cn · 2 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-b4feee5cc5db23b8
Publisher
Name not classified · news.sina.com.cn
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2011-01-26
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Average daily ridership of 7,000, against the metro company forecast of 50,000 a day for 2010 and 2011; a counted train carrying 26 passengers against a design capacity of 276; the entrances, the 20:00 close and the separate fare as the reasons riders gave.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Xinkuaibao — APM design alleged non-compliant, Guangzhou Metro denies (12 April 2011) news.ifeng.com · 4 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-1c4c4954c4b4ab1e
Publisher
Name not classified · news.ifeng.com
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2011-04-12
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Complaint that platform widths, entrance counts and missing escalators breach the national metro design code; the reporter's own measurements; Guangzhou Metro's reply that the code does not apply because the line's one-way capacity is 10,000 passengers an hour.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Xinkuaibao — one year of sightseeing trial operation completed, last train put back half an hour (9 November 2011) news.sina.com.cn · 2 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-e7e213de14dc2f4f
Publisher
Name not classified · news.sina.com.cn
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2011-11-09
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

End of the one-year sightseeing trial period; operating hours extended to 23:00 after earlier steps from 20:00; average daily ridership at opening of about 8,000; a single-day record of 62,000 on 1 October 2011.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Guangzhou Daily — "the APM line cannot fill up": should it be extended south to Kecun? archived copy (20 August 2014) web.archive.org · 2 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-694d22ac8aa3978c
Publisher
Name not classified · web.archive.org
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2014-08-20
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Metro-company ridership data for July 2014: 29,034 a day on the APM, under 60% of the forecast, 21.68% up year on year; no APM station had needed passenger-flow control that year; Line 3 alongside at 138.61% of capacity in the morning peak.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Guangzhou Daily / Xinhuacheng — can the APM line be extended? Lingnan Square station has left room (25 April 2023) huacheng.gz-cmc.com · 4 linked claims

Open original source ↗

Stable source ID
src-dcffd46ef62dcb69
Publisher
Name not classified · huacheng.gz-cmc.com
Type / language
web-page · language not classified
Published
2023-04-25
Updated
Not recorded
Source last checked
No source-level check date
Record last verified
2026-08-02
Dossier created
2026-08-27
Retrieved copy
No local capture recorded
Archive
No archived copy linked
Content hash
No captured content hash
Locator
Open the recorded source note

Line about 4km long; ridership reached the initial forecast of 50,000 a day in 2018 at 49,000; the line was built to three-car capacity but equipped with two-car trains; 2023 tender for a vehicle-procurement study, citing looming capacity shortfall and equipment reaching the end of its design life.

Descriptive only — not page/paragraph exact
Claims linked
Known limits of this passport
  • Publisher names and source languages have not yet been classified; domains are recorded without guessing.
  • Existing source notes are descriptive locators, not page- or paragraph-exact citations.
  • A missing archive, publication date or content hash is shown as null rather than inferred.
  • The project-level evidence grade ranks the strongest source in the entry; it is not a truth score for every claim.