clm-a441edac64d724e7
quantitative
In September 2015 Eindhoven adopted an eight-rule "data code" declaring data collected in public space public property
Permanent project revision
Revision 2026-08-26-claim-mapping · effective 2026-08-10
Current revision. This is the snapshot used by the live entity page.
Added a seven-claim evidence mapping and a sourced lesson; restated the impact with the Utrecht inventory figure and the successor project's own status; recorded the IoT charter's revision date.
sha256:dcb236c9af19540105f3a35d8361c19ed3e1e5ed185f2f4f6c9fa50567d3e56b
replace /snapshot/projectFingerprint — Updated projectFingerprint to the current sourced project record.replace /snapshot/claims — Updated claims to the current sourced project record.replace /snapshot/sources — Updated sources to the current sourced project record.The text below is copied verbatim from the published record. Each claim names the source dossiers that carry it; caveats stay attached to the claim they qualify.
clm-a441edac64d724e7
quantitative
In September 2015 Eindhoven adopted an eight-rule "data code" declaring data collected in public space public property
clm-9b6c0701a796e320
descriptive
plus a Smart Society IoT Charter on open standards and privacy
clm-aca14e4a12274d4f
quantitative
A 2018 pilot let anyone register a public sensor on an interactive map, but it stayed voluntary
clm-b99e880fe31274e6
quantitative
A year after the 2018 Stratumseind pilot, no public institution, living lab or private company had completed the voluntary sensor registration
clm-485e579c75699226
quantitative
An inventory in Utrecht in 2019 found that city managing more than 5,500 sensors in public space without a clear record of where they stood
clm-c1d3219265692e39
descriptive
The national successor, SensRNet, states that active development is paused and its environments are no longer available
clm-a5167397b0ddc83b
quantitative
The question that produced the register in the first place — if a resident asks about the data being collected on them, who can answer? — had no answer in 2018
This layer records what is known about each source, what is still missing, and the exact snapshot this page is rendering. A missing date, archive or hash stays visible as missing.
Awaiting operator and domain-expert review; publication of this revision implies neither.
sha256:dcb236c9af19540105f3a35d8361c19ed3e1e5ed185f2f4f6c9fa50567d3e56b
src-97c51edf9f47f18aThe eight-rule data code; rule 1: data in public space is public property.
src-d056c85591b8d505Seven principles: privacy first, open data/interfaces, open standards, modularity, security, social responsibility.
src-54729d0f4dec8d0bConfirms Sept. 2015 date and rule text; critiques undefined anonymization standard.
src-b5884530154d22b3Pilot with Kadaster started on Stratumseind, voluntary registration, aimed at citywide rollout.
src-6e202c05617a46adPeer-reviewed: a year after the pilot, no public institution, living lab or private company had completed the voluntary sensor registration. Taylor & Francis blocks direct fetching; the sentence was confirmed through a search pass against the publisher's own page.
src-eaf972b2d170e927Pilot worked technically but was 'not affordable for a municipality' alone; nobody could answer residents' questions about their own data.
src-c86b041b75735400Carries the Utrecht figure: an inventory in 2019 showed the municipality managing more than 5,500 sensors in public space, with no clear record of where they stood or how they were registered. Also reports the national successor still at proof-of-concept in 2023, stalled on funding and governance.
src-1be26da1fee73331States, in Dutch, that active development is paused and that the production, demo and test environments are no longer available.