1001 Evidence Brief

💰 Which smart-city projects publish what they cost?

Few of them, and not the ones you would expect. 236 of 1167 entries state a cost at all — 20.2%. A public-private partnership publishes a price 38% of the time, a publicly funded project 19%, and a privately funded one least of all at 10%. Disclosure follows the procurement announcement, not the public purse.

20.2% state a cost at all 236 of 1167 published entries. The other 931 name no figure in any currency.
38% vs 19% public-private against public budget 79 entries run as a partnership, 647 funded from a public budget. The partnership is roughly twice as likely to name a price.
139 cities where no entry names a price Of 265 documented cities, 126 have at least one entry that states what something cost.

✔ Every published entry is checked against the public sources it cites before publication.

Who publishes a price, by who is paying

States a costStates none

Funding model Entries Cost disclosed ShareEntries
All published entries 1167 236 states a cost, 931 states none 20%236
Public-private partnership 79 30 states a cost, 49 states none 38%30
Mixed / blended 103 32 states a cost, 71 states none 31%32
Grant-funded 77 18 states a cost, 59 states none 23%18
Utility-funded 74 14 states a cost, 60 states none 19%14
Public budget 647 122 states a cost, 525 states none 19%122
Not stated 145 16 states a cost, 129 states none 11%16
Private 42 4 states a cost, 38 states none 10%4

The ordering is the finding. A partnership or a mixed-funding project is announced through a procurement event — a contract award, a concession signing, a bond issue — and that event has a number in it. A line in a municipal budget has no press release, and a company spending its own money has no reason to publish one at all, which is why privately funded entries sit at the bottom at 10%.

Representative entries

Method

An entry counts as stating a cost when its record carries a cost figure at all — any currency, any precision, capital or programme. That is 236 of 1167 published entries.

The funding model is the atlas's own classification of who pays, from a fixed vocabulary: public budget, public-private partnership, grant, utility, private, mixed, or not stated. Entries whose funding this atlas could not establish sit in the last group and are shown rather than dropped.

The category breakdown is computed the same way; the domain that discloses most often is Energy at 32%. Every figure is regenerated at build time from the published data.

What this cannot tell you

The slice behind every number

Every figure above is computed at build time from the published data, and the rows it counts are downloadable as one file: which-smart-city-projects-publish-their-cost.json. Recomputing the numbers is a matter of counting that file. The full datasets are on the open data page, under CC BY 4.0.

Where to read next

The costs page lists the largest disclosed figures and what they bought. Who publishes the evidence asks the same kind of question about sources rather than money. And the brief on who evaluates smart-city projects finds that an audit office — the institution most likely to publish a cost — reaches almost none of them.

All briefs · Who publishes the evidence · How the record ages · The state of the evidence

✉️ Get the next source-checked smart-city project in your inbox

One short email a week: the Landmark, one Insight, the new cities. No spam, one-click unsubscribe. About the newsletter · RSS